The blog is an informal platform for Andrew and Dave to discuss the ins and outs of starting a seafood promotion program. It's no picnic... or is it one big picnic with tons of great seafood?! You decide. Loosen your tie and weigh in on current topics here.

Archive for the ‘Sustainability’ Category

Question about the safety of wild vs. farmed salmon

Monday, August 9th, 2010


Here’s a question we recently received: Is farmed salmon really as safe to eat as wild salmon? …The short answer is yes.

Dr. Charles Santerre of Purdue University, whose area of expertise deals with women and children and their sensitivity to toxins, states that, “The best choice for pregnant women is farmed or wild salmon. These fish are high in healthy nutrients and low in pollutants. Farmed salmon is more affordable and available year round. The concerns over PCBs in farmed salmon have been evaluated by experts and found to be insignificant compared to the health benefits.”

Santerre puts into context the definitive study on PCBs and other contaminants in Pacific salmon (wild) and Atlantic salmon (farmed): Ronald A. Hites et al., “Global Assessment of Organic Contaminants in Farmed Salmon,” Science 303, no. 5655 (January 9, 2004): 226-229. (Note that the term “organic” is used in the chemical sense, not the agricultural sense.)

The Hites paper specifically begins saying, “…our preliminary study showed no significant difference in methylmercury levels between farmed and wild salmon.”

Hites found the average PCB level in farmed salmon to be 37 parts per billion (ppb), and the average PCB level in wild salmon to be 4 ppb. Compare this to the tolerance limit set by both the FDA and Health Canada: 2000 parts per billion.

The US EPA has a lower reference dose is based on the actual consumption rate and one’s body weight. For 132 pound person eating 12 oz. of cooked salmon per week, this limit is 50 ppb, according to this paper by toxicologist Charles Santerre: Charles R. Santerre, “Balancing the risks and benefits of fish for sensitive populations,” Journal of Foodservice 19, no. 4 (2008): 205-212.

Santerre advises that, in order to minimize PCB exposure regardless of species or level, cook the fish and cut off the skin.

Furthermore, Santerre notes that, “Americans receive 42% of dioxin-like compounds (which includes some of the PCBs) from meat products; 17% from dairy products; 12% from fruits and vegetables; 10% from poultry and eggs; 13% from other foods; and only 8% from fish products. Thus, when eating fish and not one of these other foods, consumers may actually be reducing their intake of dioxin- like compounds including PCBs.”

Four Fish Dinner at Ammo – Sustainable Tastes Better

Monday, August 9th, 2010


What does it take to get people interested in eating responsible seafood? Sustainability is confusing. Certainly it doesn’t help when the word is loosely tossed around in social and business settings as if it were the next political movement. Is the answer to blanket people with scientific reports, possibly scaring them towards more responsible seafood? There is biology indicating that we could be harming our oceans by fishing in environmentally unfriendly manners, yet at the same time, there is a significant amount of science showing that we need to eat more seafood. So how is it possible to achieve this balance?

Fortunately for groups like Seafood for the Future, Paul Greenberg, author of Four Fish- The future of the last wild food, recently introduced an effective strategy which is already involving people in making more conscious decisions about the food they eat. In one condensed effort he put aside all the calculated seafood talk and told a story. Actually he told many stories, covering four different species of fish and the voices of fisherman and fish farmers all over the globe. At the heart of his story is the relationship between a once abundant food source and the people that live on its survival. To make this story even more relevant, and actually follow through with a call to action such as “eat more sustainable seafood,” Paul Greenberg himself, the man,the myth, and the soon-to-be legend, co-hosted a dinner in Hollywood at AMMO restaurant last night (Sunday, August 8th) featuring only sustainable seafood.

If the goal of AMMO chef Daniel Mattern (formerly of Lucques, AOC and Clarklewis in Portland) was to make the diner think “wow sustainable tastes better!” than he succeeded 100%. Arctic Char, Carlsbad Oysters, Mussels, Clams, and Barramundi were all prepared with both simplicity and perfection. Chef’s skill was seamlessly laced through each dish, not in an arrogant manner, but instead as brief but bold brushstrokes, making each dish that much more flawless and further exemplifying our mission here at SFF that “seafood should be approachable.” Textures were certainly not forgotten either, something that can easily magnify any fish dining experience. The crisp celery in the hot smoked arctic char salad was an unexpected but impeccable addition and certainly a playful crunch. The fennel amongst the clams and mussels added essential tooth, and the innovative use of flat leaf Italian parsley within the grilled Barramundi dish played brilliantly against the richness of the fish. For those people whose number one seafood choice is the “bad boy” Chilean sea bass, chef’s grilled Barramundi should quickly jettison this new fish to the top spot as he has mastered the art of making barramundi as rich as fried rocky road ice cream.

Interestingly, every item on the menu was farmed. And while Greenberg doesn’t explicitly state that he wholeheartedly supports all fish farming in his book, his positive and encouraging statements were certainly a breath of fresh air in the world of Anti-Fish Farming campaigns.

Here are three condensed lessons to be learned:

1. Sustainability is more than numbers, it is about a story and the interrelated nature of the story’s elements. By not eating fish all together, communities reliant on the economies created through this trade will be destroyed. On the same note, however, by overfishing species, many communities are in peril as they no longer have a product to support their profession. Every story about this paradox is a springboard towards awareness and eventually mobilizing people to act through compromise and improvement.

2. Four Fish is a must read and a great gateway novel into the world of sustainability

3. If you haven’t been to AMMO restaurant, go ASAP- you won’t regret it

Ammo’s Sustainable Seafood Menu:

“Four Fish”

Carlsbad oysters on the half-shell with shallot mignonette & fresh horseradish

Hot-smoked Arctic char with marinated beets, chopped egg & celery seed vinaigrette

Pan-roasted mussels & clams with summer shell beans, pickled chili, and fennel pollen

Grilled barramundu with eggplant caponata, basil & aioli

Roasted figs with honey ice cream

*************************************************

AMMO Restaurant
1155 N. Highland Ave.
Los Angeles, CA

323.467.3293

A picture worth a thousand words

Friday, July 30th, 2010

Rather than take the recent suggestion of Food and Water Watch that we “Picture thousands of fish eating, excreting and growing in crowded, dirty operations that necessitate the use of chemicals, antibiotics and pesticides that can harm both consumers and the environment,” have a look at the following image.

This is an actual picture of one of the few commercial marine fish farms in the US: Kona Blue, which operates off of the Big Island of Hawai’i (click to enlarge). We’ll be visiting Kona Blue in September, so be sure to check back for more details. As always, we welcome photos and facts supporting other points of view. More pictures here.

The Best of the Best–City Sea Foods Brings on a New Chief Sustainability Officer

Tuesday, July 27th, 2010

The seafood supply chain is a long one, some might even say too long–From water to plate, seafood will pass through various hands (quite literally) from the processor, wholesaler, distributor, restaurant, and finally, to the plate. Once an item is removed from the water it is imperative that it be handled with speed, care, and precision in order to make sure it doesn’t waste valuable time awaiting the final “seafoodie”. In addition, as the demand for well-managed seafood increases, every member in this distribution process plays a vital role in making sure that the final end user, the consumer, is able to feel confident selecting the most responsible seafood. If one step along this staircase of communication is weak, the entire framework for strengthening the sustainable supply chain becomes compromised. Even if the server at your favorite restaurant isn’t aware of the source of your fish, it is impossible to make an educated decision and, as many would suggest, “vote with your fork”. One of the most important, and arguably the most dynamic but often forgotten about roles in this procedure, is a seafood sales representative.

Seafood sales executives are pressured to not just stay on top of market trends, price fluctuations, the demands of overworked and temperamental chefs, but also the ability to be the educators for an industry that is responsible for serving over 80% of the seafood eaten in the United States. In addition to this, they are tasked with demystifying the hip world of sustainability, an arena that has become increasingly vague and full of skeptical green washing. It takes a distinctive person to manage this information, a few steps beyond the door-to-door vacuum sales that one might imagine. For all the chefs here in southern California, SFF is excited to introduce you to a new leader in the seafood world–Melissa Carrasquillo.

Melissa Carrasquillo was recently named sustainable seafood officer at the well-known City Sea Foods. Fortunately for us here at Seafood for the Future, we have had the opportunity of working closely with Melissa and can attest that she is by far one of the most passionate and energetic seafood mavens in southern California. Melissa exemplifies a vital link in the flow of information and education. Melissa’s role is responsible for connecting the work of many sustainable seafood programs, the restaurant world, and ultimately (and hopefully) the fisherman themselves. We applaud Melissa’s strategy to consolidate all of the information from various sources such as Blue Ocean Institute, Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch Program, Seafood for the Future, and many others in an effort to amalgamate a bounty of reliable information.

City Sea Foods is continually pushing forward to establish the highest standards for purchasing only the most well-managed seafood. Melissa’s role within this challenge is one that makes the efforts of both consumers and fisherman alike more tangible. She is the source of information that restaurant decision-makers are seeking. Where did this fish come from? How was it caught? Is it under a fishery management plan? What are the sustainability ratings from within the world of NGO’s? All of these questions shape a sustainable purchasing policy, and if they are left unanswered, the industry as a whole suffers.

Read more about City Sea Foods and Melissa’s new position on Seafood Source.

If you are a chef looking for responsible seafood please email Melissa at melissac@cityseafoods.com

Marine Harvest Visit Part One

Friday, July 2nd, 2010

Andrew and I spent the better part of last week in Canada visiting salmon farming facilities in British Columbia, starting with the Skretting feed mill in Vancouver and ending with a hatchery in Campbell River. It was our hope that a firsthand view would give us greater insight into the practices of British Columbian salmon farming.

From the beginning, it is clear that this trip will not be a formal investigation. We have been invited to Campbell River as guests of Marine Harvest, and it is not our intent to validate BC salmon farming practices by going on a guided tour. However, much can be learned simply through observation; Andrew can walk through any commercial kitchen and tell you how well it is run from the subtle clues that only an experienced chef would recognize. Based on my experience, I can usually say the same of fish farms and the facilities that support them. The type of equipment we see, the condition of the facilities, and the proficiency of the technicians will tell us far more than the official tour.

Clare Backman, Director of Sustainability for Marine Harvest, picks us up on the Canadian side of customs and will be our guide for the duration of the trip. He is determined to give us an experience that is as objective as possible. “I’m not going to sugar coat anything for you,” he states soberly. In spite of this, Backman is genuinely excited to visit some of the sites with us, not often having an excuse to visit facilities like the feed mill. It’s one of the places we’ve specifically asked to visit in order to better answer questions about the content of the feed.

Located in Vancouver, the Skretting feed mill is the primary producer of feed for Marine Harvest. Skretting world wide produces around 1 million tons of feed annually. Interestingly, Skretting also provides feed to salmon hatcheries that grow fish for enhancement of wild salmon stocks here in the US.

Chris Oikawa, nutritional specialist for Skretting, meets us at the reception desk and invites us into the conference room to answer questions. Oikawa started his career in the husbandry department of the Vancouver Aquarium, and we chat amiably about public aquariums and their similarities with fish farms. After a brief presentation on the nutritional requirements of fish and the history of technology employed by the mill, we’re ready to get see the actual process of making feed.

The smell of fresh feed permeates the whole facility, but quickly fades into the background as we become accustomed to it. We put on the required lab coats and safety gear as Wayne the technician extruder (pellet making machine) operator describes the flow of materials through the mill and how the process is controlled from a central command station. The status of each machine can been seen at a glance on the monitors in this room. “Let’s go into the mill itself,” Wayne suggests, watching me squint at the screen, “then you’ll have a better idea of what you’re looking at here.”

We step out of the control room into the mill, where the abrasive thrumming of the machines is deafening. In spite of the noise, I keep my earplugs in my hand so I can hear Wayne’s description of each step. Wayne stops at the extruder – arguably the heart of the mill – to explain the machine that creates pellets from a doughy mixture. The extruder is like a giant Play-doh spaghetti maker, with an auger that pushes the dough through a pellet die. The size of the holes in the pellet die determines the diameter of the pellet, which is different for each size of fish according to the size of its mouth. The smallest size is barely larger than a grain of sugar. Today, Wayne is making 12mm pellets, the largest pellet made for salmon.

Truthfully, there is not much new here in terms of the handling of the ingredients; this is the same extrusion technology used to produce certain kinds of breakfast cereals. The advantage of this technology is that not only can the pellet size and content be tightly controlled, but also its buoyancy. A steam jacket surrounding the barrel of the extruder controls the temperature of the auger, barrel, and pellet mix. Controlling the temperature of the jacket results in more air in the mix and breakfast cereal or fish pellets that float. For salmon, a slow-sinking pellet is desirable in order to give the fish enough time to strike the pellet.

Wayne takes us to each station in turn to ensure that we see the whole process. It’s a bit confusing, since we’re not going in order: we start at the step closest to the control room, winding through a maze of catwalks whose layout is partly governed by use of gravity to move the ingredients. Each time we pass the extruder – some five times in the course of the tour – Wayne opens a panel and deftly removes a sample of brand new pellets. Correct texture, color, and shape can be seen by eye by an experienced technician long before the formal quality control procedures, and Wayne takes a second to examine each sample before herding us along.

Those formal quality tests happen in the mill’s laboratory, where Wayne and the other technicians examine each batch of pellets for their physical qualities, nutritional content, and a metric known as pellet durability. Durability is a characteristic that must be tailored to each species and its needs. Shrimp, being slow-eating bottom dwellers, require a sinking pellet that is highly durable so they can take their time eating it. For salmon, the degree of pellet durability is determined by the automated feeding system that shoots the pellets out to the fish pens. If the pellet has insufficient durability, it will break into pieces and be wasted. With feed representing 60% of the cost of raising fish, farmers have a strong incentive to ensure that maximum feed efficiency begins with the pellet itself.

Examining the pellets as they exit the durability tester, another unique characteristic of the feed is apparent. The pellets are harder than dog food (the closest equivalent that comes to mind), but nowhere near as gritty. Like pellet fragments, any dust or grit (technically known as “fines”) would be lost in the water and unavailable to fish. Thus, the finished pellets are necessarily uniform and almost clean-looking.

At this point, Oikawa hands me a small tub of one of the ingredients being tested. It is a dried substance that resembles ground herbs or seeds. “It’s poultry meal,” says Oikawa, smiling. “Smell it. It’s like peanut butter.” Sure enough, it has a clean, sweet scent that makes me momentarily desire some complementary jam and bread. It’s surprisingly far from what I had imagined poultry meal to be like, so I press Oikawa for details.

It turns out that farmed salmon do not have to fulfill their nutrient requirements from any particular source. That is, while salmon require protein and lipids, they are perfectly capable of using less expensive and more sustainable vegetable or animal meal instead of fishmeal and fish oil (though complete replacement is not yet possible). However, fishmeal and fish oil used in salmon feeds are included not only for the sake of the fish. These ingredients are used so that the salmon will have a nutritional profile that is suitable for human consumption, particularly with respect to omega-3 fatty acids. In this case, Marine Harvest requires Skretting to include enough fishmeal and fish oil in the feed to produce salmon that match the fatty acid profile of wild Pacific salmon (roughly 2.8g per 100g edible portion).

Later on the trip, Backman would show me an email he’d just received on his Blackberry from [a large, well-known retail chain] regarding the omega-3 content of Marine Harvest products. The retailer performs its own testing for omega-3 levels and requires Marine Harvest to produce salmon with the nutritional profile they have agreed upon. In effect, the retailer and Marine Harvest have created a standard for the nutritional benefits of farmed salmon on behalf of their customers.
Considering that there is no government requirement for omega-3 content in any salmon, I find this to be an interesting example of corporate responsibility.

Apart from protein and lipids, what else is in the feed? Carbohydrates make up the next major component, followed by minerals, moisture, and vitamins/pigments. Carbohydrates are not as big a part of salmon diets as they are for many other land farm animals, since there aren’t very many starchy or sugary food sources available in the ocean. Consequently, fish really don’t use carbs for fuel.


20 – 38% lipids: fish oil, vegetable oil (e.g. canola oil)
10-13% carbohydrate (includes fiber)
37% – 50% protein – fish meal, corn gluten, wheat, soya meal, poultry meal
10% minerals (e.g. potassium, known as pot-ash)
7% moisture
<1% vitamins (B, C, E) and pigments

Pigments have been cited as a major concern for consumers even though they make up a small percentage of the diet, so we linger on this topic for a bit before leaving the feed mill. It turns out that what is sometimes referred to as “dye” or “paint” is a naturally-occurring pigment found in many red, orange, and yellow vegetables (think bell peppers). This group of colorants, known as carotenoids, is named for the fact that they make carrots orange. Like the beta-carotene found in carrots, the carotenoid pigment used in salmon feed (astaxanthin) is a powerful anti-oxidant that is quite good for you. It’s surprising how often we hear the nutritional advice to eat more vibrantly colored natural foods (Chef Ann Cooper adds her own caveat that gummy bears do not count), but we do not often recognize that salmon falls within this category.

Finally, I ask Oikawa about the use of antibiotics, since they are not on the ingredient list. Only a few have been legally approved, he says, and both the US and Canada explicitly require the supervision of a veterinarian for their use. Despite popular belief, fish farms cannot use antibiotics to promote growth or prevent disease – only as a treatment prescribed by a vet. Consequently, their usefulness is limited.

If you want to find out more about formulated feeds for salmon, see the FAO document entitled Nutrition of Fish and Crustaceans: a Laboratory Manual.

Next stop: the Marine Harvest farm site